changing

The USPTO refused to register the mark AMERICAN BARRISTER for authorized companies, deeming the mark to be merely descriptive below Section 2(e)(1) and primarily geographically descriptive below Part 2(e)(2). Applicant Robert J. Olejar’s specimens of use indicated that he is each a British barrister and an American lawyer at law. How do you assume this got here out? In re Robert J. Olejar , Serial No. 86302887 (August 11, 2016) not precedential.

There is additionally nothing mistaken, particularly in ‘problem’ questions, with letting the panel see your reasoning. That isn’t the identical as letting them see you modify your thoughts …